Dragon’s Den was a very fruitful experience. I gave a brief 5-min-intro of my project to the 2 Dragons, and they pointed out that the psychological impact of my most recent intervention(the Ministry of Potential) didn’t provide direct evidence to my topic.

However, the presentation on Dragon’s Den was the first time where I felt that I had the 3 different areas in balance, and more importantly, could explain the narrative of the project thoroughly to an audience. This is concrete progress for me as a writer and artist.

My question up till now is: How can we disrupt the psychological impact of result-based education on current and former students?

My main issue now is the cycle of research and interventions. I need a more logical link between my topic, the research that backs it up, and the interventions that fuels the research.